Step-by-step guide to form SD1

This step-by-step guide to form SD1 helps you through the process of filling in the official statutory demand form SD1. It is the form to use if you are owed £750 or more by a company. Completing the SD1 statutory demand form is the first step towards winding up the company that owes you money. It is the right form to use if the debt in question is owed by a company and is payable immediately or already overdue. Statutory demands can be very useful to show that you are serious about collecting the money that you are owed, and that you are prepared to escalate the situation if you have to. Once you have filled in your SD1 form, do not just post it. There are specific rules you must follow to make sure that the recipient gets it, and that you can prove they got it, even if they deny receipt which is fairly common. See Dealing with late payments without going to court for how to send your completed statutory demand to a company. If you have a court order for the amount you are owed, you need Form SD4 . You can also purchase this guide as part of the Debt collection toolkit .

Step-by-step guide to form SD4

This step-by-step guide to form SD4 makes completing the SD4 statutory demand form as simple as possible. Form SD4 is the right form for you if you have an unpaid court order for £5,000 or more against an individual. It is the first official step if you want to threaten the person with bankruptcy if they do not pay up and can be very effective in prompting action. Once you have filled in the SD4 form, you must do everything you reasonably can to bring it to the debtor’s attention and, wherever it is practical to do so, you must give it to them in person. Keep a record of the time, date and address where the statutory demand was handed to the person who owes you and keep anything else that confirms they received it, eg correspondence from them mentioning it. If you do later wish to apply to court to make them bankrupt, you will need to prove that you served the SD4 form properly. If you do not have a court judgment for the debt, you need form SD1 .
See all solutions
Disputes about intellectual property
Receiving a cease and desist letter, a claim form, or an injunction application in an intellectual property dispute
Q1:What is a cease and desist letter in an intellectual property dispute?

A in an dispute is simply a letter demanding that you stop doing something, eg that you stop using someone else's . It has no legal force whatsoever, although you should not ignore it if you receive one (see Q&A 2). Even if it is written by a lawyer or demands compensation from you for the alleged infringement, it cannot compel you to stop doing anything or to pay any money to the sender.


Q2:How should I respond to a cease and desist letter?

You should not ignore a under any circumstances, in the hope that the issue goes away. Often a signals that the sender is willing to take you to court if you do not stop doing the act complained about in the letter. Therefore, ignoring a can encourage the other person to formally take you to court using a (see Q&A 7). Further, if you do end up going to court over the dispute and lose, the court may make you pay the other person more money because you ignored their original letters.

You should always respond in private to the sender, and in a calm and reasonable manner. Being aggressive or inflammatory will not help you to resolve the situation, and may well cost you more time and money, and cause you more stress, in the long run. Further, if you wrongly threaten to sue someone in relation to to try to get them to back off, you can actually open yourself up to being sued. It is also important to bear in mind that if you do end up going to court over the dispute and lose, the court will take into account your behaviour leading up to the court case when deciding how much money you have to pay the other person.

It is therefore crucial to always respond calmly and reasonably to a .

See Q&A 3 for what to say in your response if you know you are not infringing the sender's .

See Q&A 4 for what to say in your response if you accept you are the sender's .

See Q&A 5 for what to do if you are unsure whether you are the sender's .


Q3:What should my response to a cease and desist letter say if I know I am not infringing the sender's intellectual property?

A will describe the acts which the sender claims are infringing their rights; for example, it may say you are selling using a logo similar to their . If you know for a fact that you are not doing the acts mentioned in the , then you should send a polite but firm letter in reply explaining this. You should try to include some evidence for your claims (eg by enclosing a copy of your latest marketing campaign, which shows that you are not using the other person's ).

See Q&A 4 for what to say in your response if you accept you are the sender's .

See Q&A 5 for what to do if you are unsure whether you are the sender's .


Q4:What should I do if I accept that I am breaching someone's intellectual property and they have sent me a cease and desist letter?

If you accept that your actions are infringing the sender's rights, you should stop using the sender's as requested in the letter (this might involve changing your business name or logo, removing packaging which contains the infringing , removing content from your website, or stopping sale of infringing products, among other things). Note that if you are not sure whether you are infringing or not, you should contact a lawyer (see Q&A 5).

You are not legally obliged to pay any money to the sender of a , but you should politely respond and advise the sender that you have stopped the offending actions or that you will stop within a certain time frame. If you do end up going to court over the dispute and lose, the court will take into account your behaviour leading up to the court case when deciding how much money you have to pay the other person. Cooperating with the sender may help you avoid (for example, the sender may want you to sign an agreement confirming that you will not infringe their in future). However, before signing any legal documentation requested by the sender, it is best to consult a lawyer (for example, your lawyer may be able to arrange for the documentation to release you from past liability for your infringements). For access to a specialist lawyer in a few simple steps, you can use our Ask a Lawyer service.


Q5:What should I do if I receive a cease and desist letter and I am not sure whether I am breaching the sender's intellectual property?

If you are unsure whether you are doing the acts mentioned in the , or are unsure about whether you should stop those acts, then you should consult a lawyer. For access to a specialist lawyer in a few simple steps, you can use our Ask a Lawyer service. See also Q&A 13. A lawyer will be able to tell you whether you are indeed infringing on someone else's rights and whether you have any defences which might protect you. However, you should always bear in mind that it is very expensive to use lawyers extensively (see Q&A 14), and there are several low-cost ways of resolving disputes which do not involve going to court or using lawyers (see Q&A 16).


Q6:Can I sue someone who has sent me a cease and desist letter?

If you receive a threat of a lawsuit which is completely unjustified, then you may be able to sue whoever sent the letter. However, this is an aggressive and expensive move, and should be done only as a last resort where someone is persistently threatening to sue you for something which you have not done.


Q7:What is a claim form in an intellectual property dispute?

If you receive a in an dispute, it means that someone has started the process of suing you for infringing their . A blank copy of a is available online.

Note that the used to start a claim in the , the , and the is the same. To work out which type of claim you are facing, you should look at the box marked 'In the' in the top right-hand corner of the form.


Q8:What should I do if I receive a claim form alleging that I have infringed someone's intellectual property rights?

If you receive a you should immediately seek legal advice (although see Q&A 12 for an exception to this). This is because you must respond to a in a particular way within 14 days of the . If you do not respond in time, then the other person can write to the court and ask for judgment to be given against you without hearing anything more from you. For access to a specialist lawyer in a few simple steps, you can use our Ask a Lawyer service. See also Q&A 13.

If you are having difficulties finding a lawyer quickly, you can buy yourself more time by filling in and returning the '' form which arrived with your . A blank copy of an form (also known as 'Form N9') can be found online. The form is only half a page long and is fairly self-explanatory – you enter the name of the person who sent you the , your contact details and date of birth, sign it, and date it. Where it says 'Tick the appropriate box', you will usually select the first option 'I intend to defend all of this claim'. You must submit an within 14 days of the 's . Doing so will give you 28 days from the of the to find a lawyer or a defence (this is a 14 day extension on the usual period of 14 days, see above).


Q9:What is an injunction in an intellectual property dispute?

An in an dispute is a tool that a person can use to stop you doing something which might infringe upon that person's . An may, for example, order you to stop using a logo which is too similar to someone else's .

There are two types of – permanent and interim. An is a temporary granted at short-notice which only lasts until a full trial, where the court will decide whether to order a permanent . A permanent will usually be issued against you where you have lost a court case and the court has decided that you are infringing the rights of someone else. It lasts at the very least until the right that you have infringed expires, however under exceptional circumstances it may last longer.


Q10:What does an injunction application to stop me using someone else's intellectual property look like?

If someone applies for a permanent against you, then you will likely only receive a . For information on what the will look like, and how to respond to it, see Q&A 7 and Q&A 8.

If someone has applied for an interim, or temporary, against you, then you will receive an Application Notice (also known as Form N244) with box 3 containing the words 'interim' and '' in some way. You will also receive a written statement of some kind from the other person to support the application. This statement will give the other person's version of events and will explain why they believe they deserve an . For information on what to do should you receive an application for an , see Q&A 11.


Q11:What should I do if I receive an interim injunction application to stop me using someone else's intellectual property?

It is essential that you immediately seek legal advice (for access to a specialist lawyer in a few simple steps, you can use our Ask a Lawyer service. See also Q&A 13). This is because there will likely be a court hearing to determine whether the is actually ordered against you within a couple of days of you having received the Application Notice and evidence. If you cannot secure a lawyer in that short timeframe, you should still attend the court hearing. You should prepare a written statement in advance that explains, as clearly and in as much detail as you can, why you believe the should not be granted. You should give a full explanation of the infringing actions and try to bring evidence to support your claims (eg old adverts which show how you have used the logo in question). The court will listen to you even if you do not have a lawyer, however your arguments may be less effective than if you could find one.

Very occasionally, the court may allow a temporary to be granted without informing you in advance. However, even if this happens, the court will always order a date for a hearing at which you can present your counter arguments, and for that hearing you should seek a lawyer.


Finding a lawyer and going to court for an intellectual property dispute
Q12:Will I always need a lawyer for an intellectual property dispute?

No. Some claims are started in the of the (). The is designed to bring and defend disputes at a cost that is proportionate to the small sums at stake (usually less than £10,000), using an informal procedure in which parties often represent themselves. If the claim you receive is from the , you may not therefore need the services of a lawyer, and can represent yourself. See Q&A 32 and following for more information.


Q13: How can I find a lawyer for an intellectual property dispute?

For access to a specialist lawyer in a few simple steps, you can use our Ask a Lawyer service.

Once you have a list of potential representatives to consult, you should consider the following factors when picking a particular lawyer:

  1. how much they charge. Some will charge a fixed fee for your whole dispute so you always know roughly what you will pay; others will charge you per hour which they work, so costs are harder to predict and could spiral. Some might even have 'no-win-no-fee' services (for more information on costs, see Q&A 14);

  2. their experience in dealing with similar matters to yours (this is something you should ask them about);

  3. whether they will give you a fixed fee or free initial consultation to discuss your issue with you; and

  4. any recommendations or reviews of their service which you have heard from colleagues or friends, or have read online.

If you do visit a lawyer, make sure you take all paperwork and documents which are relevant to the dispute as well as some personal identification. For example, you should bring any communications you have received from the person suing you. Further, you might also have a physical object or copy of the thing that is claimed to be infringing the other person's rights. You should bring this – or photos of this – with you to the lawyer.


Q14:How much will it cost me to defend an intellectual property claim or injunction application?

It costs a lot of money to go to court, regardless of the type of dispute. Experienced lawyers' fees are often at least £175 per hour for disputes, excluding , sometimes much more, and it can take days or even weeks of work for lawyers to prepare a court case.

Note that if you win your court case, it is possible that the court will require your opponent to pay some of your legal fees. However, this may not cover all of your fees. Further, if you lose your case, you may be required to pay your own legal fees and a proportion of your opponent’s.


Q15:How can I reduce the costs of defending an intellectual property claim or injunction application?

You can do two things to reduce or avoid these costs:

  1. where you feel confident running most of a legal dispute yourself, it is possible to hire a direct-access barrister to perform specific tasks for you (eg draft court arguments and present your case in court), but leave you to do the rest (eg collect evidence). Unlike solicitors, barristers often work on a fixed-fee basis so this can help you predict your costs better and reduce them. For access to a specialist lawyer in a few simple steps, you can use our Ask a Lawyer service; and

  2. it is possible to take out insurance to cover

    1. the costs of getting initial legal advice when you first have a dispute;

    2. the costs of going to court (eg lawyers' fees and experts' fees);

    3. the compensation which you may have to pay to someone else if you lose your court case; and/or

    4. the business revenue you lose as a result of losing the court case.

      If your business is deemed to be low risk, and the cover you require is fairly simple (eg just to cover the costs of your initial legal advice for a dispute), then your insurance may only cost around £1,500 (for £100,000 worth of cover). However, if you only try to get insurance after you have received communication from your opponent then it may be very expensive to acquire. Therefore, you should try to secure insurance early on in your business life.


Q16:Can I avoid going to court to settle my intellectual property dispute?

Yes – and this is strongly recommended. As explained in Q&A 14, going to court can be very expensive. It is also time-consuming, stressful, and distracting for your business. Therefore, you should only ever go to court as a last resort.

When someone raises an issue with you, your first action should always be to try to resolve the dispute personally with the other person, to keep costs down and maintain a business relationship with the other person. However, even if the other person does not wish to resolve matters personally, and wishes to get lawyers involved, you can still use cheaper, quicker, out-of-court methods to resolve your dispute. For example:

  1. you can use lawyers to help you try to negotiate a settlement without going to court. Sometimes having a middleman between you and the person with whom you have a dispute can help diffuse the tension;

  2. if your dispute is about infringement, you can pay £200 and ask the to give a written opinion on the dispute. This will be an independent, expert piece of advice on who is in the right, and can be used as the basis for resolving your dispute. If you wish to do this, you should send two copies of Patents Form 17 and the £200 fee to the , and two copies of any statements and evidence which you wish the to consider. The 's address is at the top of Form 17. The will normally take less than three months to give its opinion; or

  3. you can use the service. This is where an independent expert from the helps you negotiate a of your dispute. A will not make a decision on your dispute, but can help you resolve the dispute yourselves. The basic fee is up to £450 for a one-day , although you will also need to pay your lawyers' fees if you use a lawyer for any of the preparation or . can only happen if both you and the other person agree to it. If you agree to hold a , you should send written confirmation to the at this email address: @.gov.. They will help you organise the and the .


Q17:Can the court order me to pay if it decides that I have infringed someone else's intellectual property rights?

If you cannot avoid going to court (see Q&A 16 for information on your other options), and you lose your dispute, the outcome could be very serious. The court could order you to stop doing the action that is infringing someone else's (eg using a logo) (see Q&A 18). Each case is unique, however, and the court may also order you to:

  1. pay compensation to the person suing you (this is the most common outcome);

  2. pay over to the other person the profit you made from selling or services using their (eg the profits from you sold which used the other person's ).

The consequences of losing a court dispute can be very serious for your business. You should therefore make every effort possible to resolve an dispute out of court (see Q&A 16).


Q18:Can the court order me to stop if it decides that I have infringed someone else's intellectual property rights?

If you cannot avoid going to court (see Q&A 16 for information on your other options), and you lose your dispute, the outcome could be very serious. The court could order you to pay money to the person whose you have infringed (see Q&A 17). Each case is unique, however, and the court could also order you to:

  1. stop doing the infringing act (eg stop using a particular logo, design, invention, or process, or stop importing particular );

  2. give up or destroy infringing (eg which you own which use the other person's or design); or

  3. make a public statement that you infringed the other person's (this is more likely for disputes between larger )

You may also be landed with a large legal bill requiring you to pay your own lawyers' fees and some of your opponent’s legal fees. See Q&A 14 for further information.

The consequences of losing a court dispute can be very serious for your business. You should therefore make every effort possible to resolve an dispute out of court (see Q&A 16).


Q19: Is infringing someone else's intellectual property rights a criminal offence?

The court may order you to pay compensation to the person whose you have infringed (see Q&A 17) or it can make other orders, eg, that you stop doing the infringing act (see Q&A 18). If you have acted dishonestly then you may also have committed a criminal offence which could lead to you being fined or, in extreme cases, sent to prison. Note that this will be decided in separate, criminal proceedings, the scope of which is beyond this service. You may, for example, be criminally prosecuted if:

  1. you knowingly sell, market, or distribute which infringe someone else's , or . For example, hosting a website which allows illegal downloads of music, or creating pirate copies of films;

  2. you knowingly receive television programmes from an illegal source to avoid paying the proper provider. For example, showing Sky television in your pub via an illegal source and without paying Sky; or

  3. if you lie by claiming that you have a , or when you do not.

Therefore, you must never knowingly copy someone else's because the consequences can be very severe.


Options for dealing with infringements to your intellectual property
Q20:What should I do if someone is infringing my intellectual property?

If you think another business or individual might be infringing your (see Names and logos: Trade marks, Writing, music, pictures and code: Copyright, Designs: Design rights and Inventions: Patents for when this might occur in relation to each of the four main areas of ), there are several available options;

  1. you could write a letter to the infringer. These letters are sometimes referred to as cease and desist letters, in which you set out your position and ask the other person to stop the infringement (see Q&A 21 for more information);

  2. if the infringement is taking place via an online marketplace, the online marketplace itself is likely to provide a specific tool for reporting infringements (see Q&A 24 for more information);

  3. another possibility is , where both sides sit down with a and try to strike a bargain everyone can accept (see Q&A 25 for more information);

  4. you may want to allow your competitor to continue doing what they have been doing, while paying you something in return. For more information about this option see Q&A 27;

  5. you could enter into a , where you agree that both you and your competitor can continue doing what they are doing with the in question, but that you will both operate within certain well-defined parameters (for example not competing for the same customers) so that you are both happy with the arrangement. For more information about this option see Q&A 28;

  6. you could take formal legal action, which may well end up in court. This is likely to give you a wider range of remedies, which can be enforced through court orders, including money and injunctions which prevent infringements happening in future. However, this is also likely to be more expensive than other options, and may require you to engage a lawyer. For access to a specialist lawyer in a few simple steps, you can use our Ask a Lawyer service. For more information about this option see Q&A 29; and

  7. sometimes infringements are also crimes, meaning that they could be investigated by public authorities. A further option therefore is to contact the relevant authorities, as they will sometimes be able to help deal with infringements in certain circumstances. For more information about this option see Q&A 30.


Q21:How do I write a letter to someone who might be infringing my intellectual property?

If you believe someone is infringing your (see Names and logos: Trade marks, Writing, music, pictures and code: Copyright, Designs: Design rights and Inventions: Patents for when this might occur in relation to each of the four main areas of ), the first option to consider before taking any other steps is sending a letter setting out your position and asking the person to stop doing the infringing act. This type of letter is sometimes referred to as a .

Note that a has no legal force whatsoever, and cannot compel the person you have written to to stop doing anything or to pay any money to you. However, receiving the letter may cause them to stop, especially if they were not aware that what they were doing infringed upon your .

See Q&A 22 for information on what a should contain.


Q22:What should a cease and desist letter to someone who might be infringing my intellectual property contain?

Your should include:

  1. who you are and what your business does;

  2. the nature of the that you feel have been infringed (eg a or );

  3. details of the product or service the person you are writing to provides which is infringing your ; and

  4. how the product or service infringes your .

You should write the letter calmly and remain professional. It is important to be aware that if you wrongly threaten to sue someone in relation to , you can actually open yourself up to being sued. It is also important to bear in mind that if you do end up going to court over the dispute and lose, the court will take into account your behaviour leading up to the court case when deciding how much money you have to pay the other person.

However, letting someone know that a right exists is not the same thing as threatening legal action, and a letter is a good way to start off a process which might lead to negotiation, or an agreement, instead of legal action. See Q&A 25 and following for more information on .


Q23:What should I do if a person stops infringing my intellectual property after I have sent them a cease and desist letter?

If you send a (see Q&A 21 and Q&A 22) and this motivates the person who is infringing your to stop, you should get a formal agreement in writing from them recognising that they have been infringing your rights, and that they agree to stop. If your competitor resumes infringing your rights after agreeing to stop and you want to take them to court, it may well be easier with this agreement as evidence. You may want to seek legal advice about what this agreement should contain, as it will depend entirely on the circumstances and what has taken place. For access to a specialist lawyer in a few simple steps, you can use our Ask a Lawyer service.


Q24:What can I do if someone is selling things on an online marketplace which infringe my intellectual property?

Most internet marketplaces (eg Amazon, eBay, Etsy etc) have a standard process for reporting infringements.

You will usually need to include the item numbers that the marketplace uses to keep track of products, so that they can identify the relevant products. You may also need to send evidence that you own the in question, for example evidence of a .

Contact methods for some individual marketplaces are as follows:

  1. Etsy

    report an infringement here.

  2. Amazon

    report an infringement here.

  3. NotOnTheHighStreet

    report an infringement here.

  4. eBay

    report an infringement here.

  5. Facebook Marketplace

    report an infringement here.

  6. Alibaba

    report an infringement here.

  7. TikTok Shop

    report an infringement here.

  8. Temu

    report an infringement here.

For more information on other available options when someone is infringing your , see Q&A 20.


Q25:When should I consider mediation in an intellectual property infringement dispute?

If you need an immediate solution, for example, the other side to stop selling their product right away, because it is having a big impact on your sales or brand, only a court can order this. If you try first, sales will only stop if the other side agrees, and the time spent trying might be too long to wait. In these circumstances you need to apply to a court for an , which is an order for the other side to stop doing something (here, selling your product). For a full explanation of what involves, see Mediation.

If you need an example to be set, perhaps to scare off other would-be infringers, or to establish a legal precedent that your infringer violated your rights, you will need to go to court. This is because most mediations will agree to a confidential settlement, meaning that you cannot use the fact of having settled as a way of discouraging other potential infringers of your .

If there is a genuine, deep-running dispute over what the law is, or about whether the actions of one side have violated that law, you might need the expertise and evidence gathering capabilities of a court. That being said, you may sometimes be encouraged by the court to attempt before you begin formal legal action that will take up court time and resources.

In many other situations, however, will be advantageous. is likely to be more private, less time-consuming and potentially less stressful than going to court. Although themselves tend to be public, disputes over them can be kept confidential if the dispute is kept out of court. It may be worth considering the effect of a public dispute on investors, or on the willingness of potential to be involved with the . If you wish to maintain a good relationship with the other party after the dispute is resolved, is more likely to achieve that goal.

See Q&A 26 for how to go about using in an dispute.

For more information on other available options when someone is infringing your , see Q&A 20.


Q26:How can I use mediation in an intellectual property infringement dispute?

You can use the service. This is where an independent expert from the helps you negotiate a of your dispute. A will not make a decision on your dispute, but can help you resolve the dispute yourselves. The basic fee is up to £450 for a one-day , although you will also need to pay your lawyers' fees if you use a lawyer for any of the preparation or . can only happen if both you and the other person agree to it.

For more information on other available options when someone is infringing your , see Q&A 20.


Q27:When should I agree with a competitor that they can make my products under a licence?

If someone is infringing your , you may want to negotiate a licence. A licence for is an agreement whereby someone else is allowed to use your , usually in exchange for payment or other promises. A licence does not give the other person ownership of your , it simply gives them permission to use your in a certain way. This will let them continue whatever it is they are doing, but they will pay you to use your . You can agree on different kinds of remuneration; it might be a flat fee, repeating payments, a percentage of profits or whatever other arrangement you come to.

A licence may be suitable where your competitor has produced a good quality product which you would not want to see removed from the market, but which violates your , or where they have managed to tap into a market that you have struggled to exploit. The terms of the deal would be up to you and your competitor to work out, and this is essentially a matter for your own commercial judgement based on the potential costs and benefits.

For more information on agreeing a licence with someone to use your , including the practical steps you need to put the arrangement in place, see Licensing your intellectual property.

For more information on other available options when someone is infringing your , see Q&A 20.


Q28:When should I consider entering into a coexistence agreement with a competitor?

If you think that another person or business is trading (or about to start trading) that has similar to you, for example a business name or product, you might consider protecting your by entering into a with that person or business.

A is a contract between two or more parties who have similar (for example business names, , , designs or ). The agreement governs how each of the parties will coexist without coming into conflict over their , setting out the obligations, conditions, rights and restrictions on each party.

are most commonly used where or business names are identical, but the situation is tolerable as both businesses plan to operate in different areas of the country. For example, if an Indian restaurant called 'Indian Gourmet', located in Leeds, receives a from a restaurant with the same name in South London, the two restaurants may decide that they have no problem with one another so long as one only trades within Greater London and the other sticks within Yorkshire. In this case, a is a way for both to get assurances that the other will not later expand into trading in the other's locale.

For more information about , including the practical steps to take to put the arrangement in place, see Licensing your intellectual property.

For more information on other available options when someone is infringing your , see Q&A 20.


Q30:When should I alert public authorities about an intellectual property infringement?

In some cases, in addition to an infringement upon the owner's , an infringement can also be a crime. This can lead to investigation by the police or another public authority, and sometimes prosecutions in a criminal court. If a public authority carries out and prosecutes any infringements that affect your , this can be helpful because:

  1. you will not have to pay for the investigation, as it is carried out by a public body, but it might still bring an end to infringement; and

  2. if there is a successful criminal prosecution, and you decide to sue separately, for example to get back money you have lost to sales, you can use the criminal prosecution as evidence.

However, you cannot rely on public authorities for all infringements of , as many are not criminal offences, but only civil offences (allowing you to sue them, but not counting as crimes). Even if a criminal prosecution is successfully brought, you will not necessarily get what you want out of it – it is unlikely to provide you with financial remedies to cover previous infringement, for example, though in a case of infringement you may be able to recover infringing copies of any works. See Q&A 31 for more information on the types of infringements that are also criminal offences.

For more information on other available options when someone is infringing your , see Q&A 20.


Q31:Which intellectual property infringements are also criminal offences?

The offences which are covered by criminal law, and so which are worth reporting to the authorities if you think they are taking place, are as follows:

  1. Most infringements of committed in the course of business and where the person knows or ought to know that they are dealing with an infringing copy, including making, importing, selling or hiring out infringing are criminal offences. See Identifying copyright in business situations for more information on what covers.

  2. Designs

    For (whether they are registered in the or the ), it is a criminal offence to intentionally copy the design to make a product in the course of business that is exactly the same as the design or has only immaterial differences, as well as to put such a product onto the market, import or export it, or stock it for one of those purposes. There are no crimes relating to unregistered designs. See Identifying design rights in business situations for more information on how designs are protected.

  3. It is a crime for someone to apply a sign identical to or likely to be mistaken for someone else's registered mark to (or their packaging), or to sell, let, offer for hire or distribute which bear such a mark. However, the process of prosecutions is often expensive, long and complex, and may not be any better than pursuing a civil action. See Identifying a trade mark in business situations for more information on what a can protect.

If you think one of these offences may have been committed, you have two options: you can report it to your local (a part of your local council), as they are the public authority most likely to prosecute related crimes, or you can bring a private prosecution, which is where you take someone to court yourself over a criminal matter. This is not something which you can do without legal representation, so if you want to do this you should speak to a lawyer experienced in private prosecution of -related crimes. For access to a specialist lawyer in a few simple steps, you can use our Ask a Lawyer service.

For more information on other available options when someone is infringing your , see Q&A 20.


What you need to think about before starting a small claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Q32:Can I start any type of small claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

No, whether your claim is suitable for the depends on:

  1. the type of right your claim relates to (see Q&A 33);

  2. the value of your claim (see Q&A 34);

  3. the remedy you are seeking (see Q&A 35);

  4. Whether the defendant raises an objection to your claim (see Q&A 36); and

  5. how straightforward your case is (see Q&A 37).


Q33:What type of intellectual property claims can I start in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track?

The court will only hear cases relating to (any type), and Community , , and Community rights and confidential information disputes.

Cases relating to other types of , eg or , cannot be heard in the , regardless of the value of the claim and the wishes of the parties involved in the dispute.

See Q&A 32 for other restrictions.


Q34:Can I start claims of any value in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track?

No, you cannot start claims of any value in the – there is a limit on the value of the claim. Your claim must be for £10,000 or less. Although the court has the power to order an award of more than £10,000, if it appears to the court from the outset that your claim is worth more than £10,000, it is likely to regard it as unsuitable for the .

See Q&A 32 for other restrictions.


Q35:Can I start a claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track regardless of the remedy I want?

No, you cannot start a claims in the regardless of the remedy you are asking for. There are certain remedies that the is unable to give.

The is suitable for claims where the remedies being sought are for infringement, an account of profits (where you are paid any unfair profits from the infringement), delivery to you or destruction of the infringing items or a final to prevent infringement in the future. See Q&A 43 for more information on the remedies that you can request.

The of the is unable to grant interim remedies, eg an . Therefore, if you need an immediate , for example to immediately stop someone from disclosing confidential information, or from using a , you should not commence proceedings in the .

See Q&A 32 for other restrictions.


Q36:Can the person I am claiming against object to the case being in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track?

Yes, the person you are claiming against, or the defendant, is permitted to object to your claim being in the . If the defendant does this in their defence, you and the defendant will be required to complete a which will have to be sent to the court and sent to each other within 14 days. The court will then make a decision on whether to allocate the case to the or to the and will notify you and the defendant of its decision.

See Q&A 32 for other restrictions.


Q37:Is the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track suitable for complex cases?

The is designed for relatively simple cases that are likely to last no longer than a day. Therefore, if your claim will need complex expert evidence or many witnesses it is unlikely to be suitable for the . See Q&A 76 for more information on what documentary evidence you may rely on.

See Q&A 32 for other restrictions.


Q38:How much will it cost to start a claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track?

To start your claim in the , you will have to pay:

  1. an initial fee to the court. The court fee will depend on the value of your claim (ie how much you want to claim from the other side). See Q&A 39; and

  2. if your case proceeds to a court hearing, you will have to pay a hearing fee. See Q&A 40.


Q39:How much will the initial fee to start a claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track be?

The court fee will depend on the value of your claim (ie how much you want to claim from the other side). See the table below.

Value of claim

Fee

Up to £300

£35

£300.01 to £500

£50

£500.01 to £1,000

£70

£1,000.01 to £1,500

£80

£1,500.01 to £3,000

£115

£3,000.01 to £5,000

£205

£5,000.01 to £10,000

£455

£200,000

5% of the amount

£500,000

If your claim is for non-monetary relief only, ie you are not claiming for or account of profits (where you are paid any unfair profits from the infringement) (see Q&A 43 on available remedies in ), then the fee is £480.

If your claim is for both monetary and non-monetary relief, then the relevant fees should be added together.

See Q&A 40 for information on the hearing fee, which will also be payable when starting a claim.


Q40:How much will the hearing fee for a claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track be?

If your case proceeds to a court hearing, in addition to the initial fee (see Q&A 39), you will have to pay a hearing fee. The hearing fee will depend on the value of your claim (ie how much you want to claim from the other side). See the table below.

Value of claim

Hearing fee

Up to £300

£25

£300.01 to £500

£55

£500.01 to £1,000

£80

£1,000.01 to £1,500

£115

£1,500.01 to £3,000

£170

£3,000.01 to £10,000

£335

See Q&A 74 and following for more information on the hearing at the .


Q41:What costs can I get back if my Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claim is successful?

The is designed to keep costs proportionate to the small sums at stake, therefore cost recovery is highly restricted (with most people representing themselves). As such, the court can only order one party to pay the other the following (including those relating to appeal):

  1. court fees (the initial issuing fee and hearing fee – see Q&A 38);

  2. expenses reasonably incurred by you or a witness in travelling to and from a hearing or for accommodation for the purposes of attending a hearing;

  3. a sum of up to £95 per person, per day for any loss of earnings or loss of leave by you or a witness due to attending a hearing;

  4. experts' fees, at a sum of up to £750 for each expert (although the use of expert evidence generally will not be appropriate in the – see Q&A 76); and

  5. any further costs, which the court decides are to be paid by the other party if the court thinks they have behaved unreasonably in the proceedings. Although a party's rejection of an offer of settlement (see Q&A 45 for alternatives to going to court and Q&A 79 for more information on settling once proceedings have been started) will not of itself constitute unreasonable behaviour, the court can take it into account when deciding on costs. Other possible factors that the court considers might be whether you failed to contact the other party and set out your complaint before starting litigation (see Q&A 46), or whether you failed to follow the court's directions (see Q&A 74).


Q42:How long will it take to receive a decision from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track?

The length of time it takes to receive a decision from the will depend in part on how long the person you are claiming from (the defendant) takes to respond to your and – see Q&A 47 for more information on these.

If, when they receive your , the defendant files an with the court, this has the effect of extending the usual 14 days' time limit the defendant is allowed to respond to your claim to 42 or 70 days, depending on whether you have complied with the – see Q&A 61. Once the defendant has responded, and if they dispute your claim, the court will send you an order containing a date for the final hearing. You will be given at least 14 days' notice (unless you agree to less) of the hearing – see Q&A 74.


Q43:What remedies can I obtain in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track?

You can obtain any of the following remedies in a at the :

  1. Damages

    This remedy is to compensate for any loss that you have suffered because of the actions of the person you are claiming from (the defendant). The purpose of an award of is to put you into the position you would be in if the person you are claiming from had not infringed your . This can be assessed in terms of, for example, lost profits, an award of a royalty, or a fee which would have been due if the defendant had properly requested authorisation to use your right. The assessment is made based on how much it would have cost the defendant to obtain a licence to legally use your . You should note that any award for will be capped at £10,000.

  2. Account of profits

    This is where the defendant will have to pay you any unfair profits they have obtained as a result of infringing your . As with damages, any award for account of profits will be capped at £10,000.

  3. Delivery up or destruction or infringing items

    Where the defendant is in possession of items which infringe your , you can request that an order be made for the infringing items to be delivered to you (or to a ). This order is sometimes combined with an order to destroy the .

  4. Final

    For example, an to stop using a or mark on certain .


Q45:Are there any alternatives to using the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track to resolve my dispute?

There are a number of alternatives to commencing proceedings at the including conciliation, , , and . Collectively, these methods are referred to as ().

You are strongly encouraged to explore the use of before commencing any sort of litigation. However, given the relatively low sums involved in , the cost of some methods can be disproportionate to the sums at stake. Nonetheless, and negotiation are frequently worth exploring. Free services are available through the charity LawWorks for parties who cannot afford to pay for .

Even if you do start a claim, there is nothing to stop you pursuing or negotiating a settlement before the final hearing. Indeed, the provides a service which you can use once proceedings have been started, up until ten working days before the hearing date. This involves a confidential one-hour appointment over the telephone and is provided free of charge. For more information on the service see Q&A 79.


Starting a small claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Q46:What should I do before starting a small claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

Once you have established that your claim is suitable for (see Q&A 32), you should consider the following before starting your claim:

  1. if you are seeking from the defendant, you should check in advance, as far as possible, whether they will be able to pay any which are ordered in your favour by the court. There is little point pursuing a claim if the defendant would not be able to pay you in any event;

  2. it is also important to note that if you wrongly threaten to sue someone in relation to , you can actually open yourself up to being sued. You should be wary of this risk when deciding to start a claim;

  3. read and comply with the Pre-Action Conduct Practice Direction. This is a guide for what you need to do before going to the court. In particular, you are encouraged to attempt alternatives to litigation such as and negotiation. You should also send a letter (often called a or ) to the defendant detailing the basis of your claim and what you would like in order to settle the matter. You should give a reasonable time to respond; 14 days is usually the minimum acceptable period if your case is a straightforward one, and no more than three months in a very complex case;

  4. You will have to indicate in the whether you have complied with the pre-action conduct practice direction before issuing your claim. If you indicate that you have not done so, then the defendant has a longer amount of time in which to respond to your claim – see Q&A 61. You should also note that a failure to comply with the pre-action conduct practice direction is a that the court can consider when assessing how to award costs in the case. Failure to comply could cost you money;

  5. consider obtaining legal advice. Although the is set up for people to bring (and defend) actions themselves, this does not prevent you from obtaining some basic legal advice before you start the claim. For information on obtaining free legal advice, see Q&A 44;

  6. attempt to resolve the dispute. The courts expect litigation to be used as a last resort. See Q&A 45 for alternatives to using the .


Q47:How do I start a small claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

You will need to complete a , sometimes referred to as Form N1. See Q&A 48 and following for guidance on completing the form, and Q&A 54 for information on what to do with your form once completed.


Q48:How do I complete a claim form to start a small claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

The form is fairly simple to complete, but the table below sets out some points to note. You should also read the Guidance Notes to completing the form.

Part of

What you should include

Top-right corner -'In the...'

Write 'In the of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, List (Ch D), , '.

Claimant(s) names and address(es) and Defendant(s) names and address(es)

The full and unabbreviated names, titles and addresses for yourself, any other claimant and all defendants. It is important to give a full address, including a postcode, for where each party lives or carries on business. You can use the free post office post code finder service.

Brief Statement of Claim

A concise summary of the nature of the claim (eg infringement of by the defendant) and the remedy (eg damages) you are asking for. If your claim relates to a , you should include your registration number.

Value

You must put a value on the claim. The statement of value should not take into account any interest or costs, any potential that the defendant might make against you, or any potential set-off that the court might make in favour of the defendant. You can either give a fixed sum or you can just state that 'the claimant expects to recover no more than £10,000'.

Vulnerability

If you believe that you, or a witness who will give evidence on your behalf, are vulnerable in any way the court needs to consider, you must explain why and advise what steps, support or adjustments you wish the court and judge to consider.

Your must state concisely all the facts and arguments you intend to rely on in support of your claim. This is so both the court and the defendant are clear on the issues in dispute. You should also indicate whether you have complied with the pre-action conduct practice direction – see Q&A 46 for further details. See Q&A 49 and following for further details on what to include in your . If your are short, you can just write them directly on to the . Otherwise, you can write them on a separate sheet and attach it to the , or send them separately to the defendant See Q&A 54 for information on the strict time frames to observe for sending . In addition, the must state if the will follow separately. The must be set out in separate consecutively numbered paragraphs and sub-paragraphs (and the pages should also be numbered). So far as possible each paragraph or sub-paragraph should contain no more than one allegation. The document should deal with the case on a point by point basis, to allow a point by point response.

You must verify your with a signed by each person who has knowledge of the facts alleged in the . Multiple signatures may be necessary, and if so, the paragraphs to which each signatory is attesting should be identified and you should amend the as necessary. Where you the separately, this will need to contain a .


Q50:What do I need to state in my particulars of claim for an unregistered design infringement small claim?

In addition to the information set out in Q&A 47 that should be included in your , you need to identify your design, and you should also state when you created your design. See Identifying design rights in business situations for more information on design rights.

To prove infringement, you must demonstrate that the defendant has copied your design, without consent, and produced an article the same or substantially similar to your design. This includes producing a technical drawing of your design for the purpose of making the article or making of the design. Note that the defendant must have copied your design for commercial purposes and not for private use.

You should clearly state that there has been infringement of your right and detail the remedy or remedies you are asking for. See Q&A 43 on available remedies.


Q51:What do I need to state in my particulars of claim for a small claim of passing off?

is an action to prevent a business misrepresenting their or services as being your and services. It provides a where you have no .

In addition to the information set out in Q&A 47 that should be included in your , you need to identify the mark or what is referred to as 'get up' (whether it consists simply of a brand name or a trade description, or the individual features of labelling or packaging) that has acquired distinctiveness as designating your or services. It is important to demonstrate that there is some actual association in the mind of the general public between your unregistered mark or 'get up' and your business. This could be evidenced through advertisements and promotion of your brand, or through actual trading figures. You should detail how the defendant's mark or 'get up' is similar to yours. It is helpful to attach copies of the identical or similar marks to the .

You will also need to demonstrate that customers have been misled into believing that the or services offered by the defendant were originating from you, whether intentionally or not. It might be helpful to provide from customers who have been misled.

It is important that you detail that you have suffered damage, or are likely to suffer damage because of the misrepresentation by the defendant, for example through actual or potential loss of sales or damage to your business's reputation (eg because the sold are inferior that the public might associate with your business).

You should clearly state that the defendant is or services as if they had been authorised or approved by your business or are in some other way connected with your business and state the remedy or remedies you are seeking – see Q&A 43 on available remedies.


Q52:What do I need to state in my particulars of claim for a breach of confidential information?

In addition to the information set out in Q&A 47 that should be included in your , you need to identify why the information is confidential. Information that is in the public domain cannot be confidential information. The information must also be clear and ascertainable, and must must have commercial value. You should ask yourself the question, would a competitor gain an advantage in the market place if they had access to the information?

You will need to demonstrate that the information was communicated in circumstances where there was an obligation of confidence, for example, where a confidentially agreement was in place. If the agreement was in writing, it is helpful to attach a copy of any confidentiality agreement to the . You will also have to demonstrate that there has been actual or proposed unauthorised use of that information.

You should clearly state that the defendant has committed a and state the remedy or remedies you are seeking – see Q&A 43 on available remedies.


Q53:What do I need to state in my particulars of claim for an infringement of a registered trade mark?

In addition to the information set out in Q&A 47 that should be included in your , you need to identify the registration number of your and the and services it is registered against. It is good practice to attach a copy of the .

You should set out clearly how you believe the defendant has infringed your . Your will be infringed when the defendant uses in the course of trade:

  1. an identical mark on identical or services to those for which your mark is registered;

  2. an identical mark on similar or services to those for which the earlier mark is registered, where there is a likelihood that the public will be confused as to the origin of the ; or

  3. a similar mark on identical or similar and services to those for which your mark is registered, where there is a likelihood that the public will be confused as to the origin of the .

If your has a reputation in the , it will have even wider protection.

Unless you are asserting that the defendant has used an identical on identical and services, as in a situation, it would be helpful to produce evidence of confusion from your average customers.

You should also clearly state that the defendant has your and state the remedy or remedies you are seeking – see Q&A 43 on available remedies.


Q54:What do I do with my completed claim form to start a small claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

You need to take or send your to the public counter at the Rolls Building (which is open on week days between 10 am and 4.30 pm):

7 Rolls Buildings Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL.

You should bring enough copies of the for the court and for each defendant involved in the dispute. The court will then 'issue' the claim by stamping the form and putting a date on it, and will then provide you with stamped copies for each defendant. See Q&A 55 for information on how the defendant gets a copy of the , and is made aware of the claim.


Q55: Who gives the claim form to the defendant in a small claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

It is up to you (the claimant) to give the defendant a copy of the and in the . The court will not do this for you. See Q&A 56 for guidance on when the needs to be given to the defendant(s).


Q56:When do I have to give the defendant the claim form in a small claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

The date on which the court stamps the (see Q&A 54) is important, as this date triggers strict deadlines for when you must send the form to the defendant.

You must send the defendant the , and a response pack before midnight on the calendar day four months from the date the court stamped your . The response pack should include forms for admitting the claim (Form N9A for a specified amount and Form N9C for an unspecified amount or non-money claim), forms for defending the claim or making a (Form N9B for a specified amount and Form N9D for an unspecified amount or non-money claims), and an form. See Q&A 57 for information on extending this deadline.


Q57:Can I extend the deadline by which I have to give the defendant the claim form in a small claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

Yes, you can apply to the court to extend the period of four months within which you have to give the defendant the but you must do so promptly and the application must be supported by evidence showing that you took all reasonable steps to attempt to give the to the defendant but were unable to do so.


Q58:How can I send the claim form to the defendant in a small claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

There are several ways that you can send the to the defendant. Depending on the method by which you are sending the to the defendant, you must take the 'Step required' in the table below by midnight on the calendar day four months from the date the court stamped your (see Q&A 56).

Method of service

Step required

First class post, DX or other service which provides for delivery on the next

Posting, leaving with, delivering to or collection by relevant service provider

Second after completion of the required step

Delivery of the document to or leaving it at the relevant place

Delivering to or leaving the document at usual or last known business or residential address

Second after delivery to or leaving at relevant place

Fax

Completing the transmission of the fax

Second after the fax transmission completed

Other electronic method

Sending the email or other electronic transmission

Second after the email or other electronic transmission sent


Q59: Can I send my particulars of claim to the defendant separately from the claim form?

Yes, it is possible to send your to the defendant separately from your . See Q&A 48 for more information on completing the , and Q&A 49 and following for more information on completing the .

If you are sending them separately, you must send the within 14 days of the of the . The deemed date depends on the method you have used to send the to the defendant. See the table in Q&A 58 for how to calculate this.

You must also ensure that you send your to the defendant no later than midnight on the calendar day four months from the date the court stamped the .

In addition, you need to supply the court with a copy of your within seven days of sending them to the defendant.


Q60:What should I do after I have sent the defendant the particulars of claim?

You must provide the court with a certificate of service stating that the documents were given to the defendant, when they were given and by what method, within 21 days of having given the to the defendant, unless the defendant has filed an within that time.


Q61:What happens after I start my small claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

The defendant must respond within 14 days of receiving your . The defendant can respond in one of the following ways:

  1. admit the claim (see Q&A 62);

  2. defend the claim (see Q&A 63); or

  3. defend part and admit part of the claim (see Q&A 64).


Q62:What happens if the defendant admits the small claim?

If the defendant admits the claim, this effectively ends the matter.

If your claim was for a specified amount of damages, the defendant can offer to pay the amount in full, offer to pay the money instalments, or offer to pay the money at a later date. If you have not specified an amount (and are seeking from the defendant), then the defendant can make you an offer. If you accept the offer, the court will order that the defendant pays this offer to you. If you reject the offer, you can ask the court to make a decision based on its own judgment as to how much the defendant should pay.

Whether you decide to reject or accept the defendant's offer, you must respond within 14 days of receiving the defendant's admittance form, or your claim will be 'stayed'. This means that your claim is suspended and you will have to apply to the court if you want to resume your claim.


Q63:What happens if the defendant defends the small claim?

If the defendant wishes to defend all or part of your claim, they must provide a defence using either Form N9D (where the amount of has not been specified) or Form N9B (where the amount of have been specified) within 14 days of receiving your .

Alternatively, the defendant may provide an within the 14-day term. This will automatically extend the time that they have to form their defence to 42 days from the date of receipt of the . However, if your did not include confirmation that you complied with the Pre-Action Conduct Practice Direction (see Q&A 46), the defendant has 70 days from the date of receiving the to file their defence.

You will receive a copy of the defence and any made.

Shortly after the defence is provided, the court will send out an order containing directions for how the case will progress and be managed until the final hearing. In exceptional cases (eg when the court thinks one of the parties has no realistic prospect of success and wants to end the claim), the court may arrange an initial hearing for you and the defendant to attend.

The court's order with directions for how the case will progress will set out a timetable for you and the defendant to send relevant documents to each other, and for the evidence of any witnesses to be provided. The will include a date for the final hearing of the claim, with at least 21 days' notice, unless both you and the defendant agree that the claim can be decided by the judge themselves without a hearing. If you have come to such an agreement with the defendant, the order will give a date by which the judge will give a written judgment. You should note that the court can make whatever directions it deems necessary and you must comply with all directions by the dates specified in the order or the court may adjourn (postpone) the case and order you to pay costs.


Q64:What happens if the defendant defends part and admits part of the small claim?

In this situation, you will receive two forms – Form N9A in which the defendant states how much of the claim they are admitting to, and Form N9B where they will state how much of the claim they are defending.

The court will give you Form N225A in which you have two options: you can accept the defendant's defence and the amount of money they have admitted to; or, accept the defendant's offer and disagree with their defence. If you disagree with the defendant's defence, the claim will continue as disputed and you may have a hearing.

Whether you decide to accept or reject the defendant's defence, you must make sure that you complete Form N225A and send it both to the court and defendant within 14 days of receiving it, otherwise the case will be stayed. This means your claim is suspended and cannot be resumed unless you make an application to the court.


Q65:What happens if the defendant ignores my Intellectual Property Enterprise Court claim form?

If the defendant fails to file an , or files an but then fails to file a defence in time, then you may apply for a judgment in default. This is where the judge automatically decides in your favour.

You cannot apply for a judgment in default unless you have provided the court with a – see Q&A 60. Additionally, you cannot request a judgment in default where the defendant has satisfied the whole of the claim (ie has paid the you are asking or has given you the you demanded) including costs or where your claim is for money and the defendant has filed or an admission of liability to pay the full amount, but has requested more time to pay.

See Q&A 66 for more information on how to apply for a judgment in default.


Q66:How can I apply for a judgment in default if the defendant has ignored my Intellectual Property Enterprise Court claim form?

You need to fill in and return a 'Request for Judgment' located at the bottom of the that was given to you by the court when they stamped the . An application for judgment in default must include evidence that the were (eg by referring to any you have given with the court). You also need to include evidence that the defendant has not provided a defence, or has provided an but no defence, that the period during which the defence must have been provided has expired, and that the claim has not been satisfied or admitted by the defendant. If you are requesting that the defendant deliver to you or that infringe your , your application for judgment in default must state the reasons why you are seeking delivery of the and must include evidence identifying the and their presumed location.

If the court is satisfied that you have delivered the and to the defendant, and that the relevant time for the defendant to provide an or defence has expired, then the court will give judgment against the defendant and give orders (formal commands) for or other remedies. It may do this by having a hearing, which you and the defendant will be notified of, or without a hearing. If no hearing is scheduled, you may be asked to provide your arguments in writing and then a written judgment will be sent to you and the defendant.


Receiving a claim form from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track
Q67:What should I do if I receive a claim form from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track?

If you receive a from the , you should carefully read over everything in the claim and the response pack that will have been provided with it. In particular, check to see whether the are included within the claim pack. If they are not (ie if the form contains the phrase ' to follow') you do not have to respond yet. However, if the are included, or you receive them after the , you must respond within 14 days or the claimant can apply for '' against you (ie judgment in their favour without any trial).

You must respond in one of the following ways:

  1. admit the claim (see Q&A 68);

  2. admit some of the claim and defend some of the claim (see Q&A 69);

  3. defend the whole claim (see Q&A 70);

  4. ask for a time extension to prepare your defence (see Q&A 73).


Q68:How do I admit an Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claim against my business?

If you concede that what is claimed is true, you must 'admit' the claim. You can do this by filling in Form 9A or Form 9C (depending on whether the claim is for a specified amount of money or an unspecified amount of money) and sending it to the claimant's address. Both forms will be included in the response pack that the claimant will send you (see Q&A 67).

For claims that are for an unspecified amount of money, you will have an option on the form to choose an amount that you think you should pay to satisfy the claim (and pay this immediately or at a later date), or to indicate that you want the court to decide the amount.

For claims of a specified amount (ie the claimant asks for a specific amount of money on their ), you will have the option on the form to admit the full claim (and pay in instalments), or admit some of the claim and defend some (see Q&A 69).

See Q&A 71 for the deadline by which you must respond to the claim.


Q69:How do I admit part of and defend part of an Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claim against my business?

If the claim is for a specified amount of money and you think some of the claimant's claim is true, but not all of it (eg perhaps you think you should pay some money, but not the whole amount they are claiming), you can admit part of the claim and defend part of the claim.

You can do this by selecting on Form 9A the amount that you admit and then also completing the defence Form 9B stating how much you dispute and giving reasons why. See Q&A 70 for more information on how to defend your claim.

Both forms will be included in the response pack the claimant sends you (see Q&A 67) and, once completed, should be sent to the court.

See Q&A 71 for the deadline by which you must respond to the claim.


Q70:How do I defend an Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claim against my business?

How you defend a claim brought against your business depends on whether the claim brought against you is for a specified amount of money, an unspecified amount of money or something other than money:

  1. If the claim is for a specified amount of money (ie the claimant asks for a specific amount of money on their ), then you need to fill in Form 9B (which will be included in the response pack the claimant sends you, see Q&A 67) and send it to the court;

  2. If the claim is for an unspecified amount of money or something other than money, then you need to fill in Form 9D (which will be included in the response pack the claimant sends you, see Q&A 67) and send it to the court.

See Q&A 71 for information on the deadline by which you must defend the claim.


Q71:What is the deadline for defending an Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claim against my business?

However you choose to respond, you need to do so within 14 days of the of the (see Q&A 58 for how to work out the ), or ask for a time extension (see Q&A 73), otherwise the claimant can apply to the court for against you (ie judgment in their favour without any trial).

See Q&A 72 for information on what your defence response should contain.


Q72:What should my defence to an Intellectual Property Enterprise small claim against my business contain?

The defence must provide a comprehensive response to the . In respect of each allegation the claimant makes, you should state whether you admit it, deny it, or, where you have no knowledge of the matter, that you require the claimant to prove it. You must state your reasons for denying any allegation. If you wish to put forward a different version of events from that given by the claimant, you must state this. Moreover, if you fail to deal with an allegation, you will be taken to have admitted it.

In both forms N9B and N9D, you will have the option to make a (ie to bring your own claim against the person claiming against you). You might want to bring a counter claim, for example, where you think the the claimant is asserting is invalid or should be revoked. However, if you make a , you will have to pay a court fee.

The defence and should normally be in the same document with the following on from the defence (eg if the last numbered paragraph of the defence is paragraph 5, the first numbered paragraph of the should be paragraph 6). The should be drafted as if it were a claim – see Q&A 48 and following for information on how to write .

See Q&A 74 and following for what happens after you file a defence.


Q73:How do I ask for more time to prepare my defence to an Intellectual Property Court small claim against my business?

If you need more than 14 days to prepare your defence to the claim (see Q&A 71 for more information on the deadline), you can provide an to the court within the 14-day time limit. You must then provide your defence (and any ) to the claimant and the court:

  1. within 42 days of of the , if these state that the claimant has complied with the Pre-Action Conduct Practice Direction; or

  2. within 70 days of deemed service of the , if it does not contain the claimant's statement of compliance with the Pre-Action Conduct Practice Direction.

    See Q&A 58 for how to work out the and Q&A 46 for more information on the Pre-Action Conduct Practice Direction.

If you do not respond within this extended time limit you will be taken to have ignored the claim, and the claimant can apply for '' against you (ie judgment in their favour without any trial).

To provide an to the court, fill in Form N9and send it back to the court. The court will notify the claimant. This form should be in your response pack, with instructions on how to fill it in.


Going to a small claim hearing at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Q74:How and when will a court hearing be arranged for a small claim at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

Once the defence has been provided, and if there is no dispute as to the allocation of the case to the of the (see Q&A 36), the court will send you a 'Notice of Allocation'. The court will also give you directions telling you what to do to prepare for the final hearing.

These directions will usually be issued without a hearing and will be based on the court's consideration of the and defence. Only in exceptional circumstances (eg when the court thinks one of the parties has no realistic prospect of success and wants to dispose of the claim) will the court set, with at least 14 days' notice, an initial hearing for the parties to attend.

The directions will set a timetable for steps that you must take, such as provide to the court and the other party copies of all the documentary evidence that you intend to rely on at the hearing. See Q&A 76 for what documentary evidence you can rely on in a in the .

You must comply with all of the directions, as if you fail to do so the court may adjourn (postpone) the case and order you to pay costs.

A date for the final hearing at which a decision on the claim is to be made will also be included. At least 21 days' notice of this date will be given. However, you can agree to receiving less notice.

See Q&A 81 for how to prepare for the hearing. If you are the party bringing the claim, you will also be required to pay the court a hearing fee within 14 days of receiving notice of the hearing date, failing which the court may order your claim to be struck out (discontinued) (see Q&A 38 for more information on fees).


Q75:Can a claim in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track be dealt with without a hearing?

The court will propose to deal with the claim without a hearing and will give you a date by which to notify it if you agree with the proposal. You may accept such a proposal where, for example, you believe the documents speak for themselves and there is nothing additional you need to say in front of the judge. If you agree to this, the court will give a date by which the judge will give a written judgment.


Q76:What evidence can I rely on in a small claim at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

When the court sends directions telling you what to do to prepare for the final hearing (see Q&A 74), it will set a timetable to provide the court and the other party copies of the documentary evidence that you intend to rely on at the hearing. The original documents should also be brought to the final hearing.

  1. Expert evidence

    In practice, expert evidence is unlikely to be needed in most and where a case does require substantial or complex expert evidence, it is unlikely to be suitable for the and will be re-allocated to the by the court. In such a situation, you should consider instructing a lawyer as a more complex process is involved. For access to a specialist lawyer in a few simple steps, you can use our Ask a Lawyer service.

  2. Witness evidence

    , whether written or oral, may be relied on at the final hearing if the court permits it. hearings are informal, and the court need not take evidence on oath.

    In deciding whether to permit , the court will consider whether the parties are represented by lawyers, the value of the claim, what the claim is about, whether a party should be required to supply further information instead, and the need for the parties to have access to justice without undue formality, costs and delays.

    Note that the maximum amount that can be claimed for loss of earnings or leave by a witness for attending a hearing is £95 per day for each person. See Q&A 41 for more information on what costs can be claimed back.


Q77:Where will my small claim case at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court be heard?

Once you have filed your claim, it will be transferred to Manchester and case managed by District Judges in the Manchester Civil Justice Centre. Unless you apply for, and are granted, the right to have your claim transferred outside of Manchester, your claim will be heard either in person in Manchester or by video link with the Manchester court. You can apply to have your claim transferred from Manchester to Bristol, Birmingham, London, Cardiff, Leeds, Liverpool or Newcastle.

If you have queries about filing your claim in London, the contact details are: Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London WC2A 2LL, DX 44450 STRAND, Tel: 020 7947 7387/6187, Fax: 0870 761 7695, Email: ipecsmallclaimstrack@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk. If you have queries about electronic filing in other Business and Property Courts throughout England, you can contact EfileSupport@justice.gov..

The hearing will take place in a court room and will be audio recorded. You can apply for a full transcript of the hearing on payment of a fee. Indeed, it might be advisable that you do so given that most judgments are given orally, rather than in writing – see Q&A 84. You are not allowed to make a recording of the proceedings yourself.


Q78:Will my small claim case at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court be heard in private?

No, the hearing will be open to the public unless the judge has decided that it should be held in private, either because the parties have agreed that it should or because there is some other reason that makes a private hearing appropriate (eg a private hearing is necessary to protect the interests of a child or a protected party, or if confidential information is involved and publicity would damage that confidentiality).


Q79:Can I settle a small claim at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court instead of attending a hearing?

Yes. Parties are encouraged to contact each other to try and settle the case or to narrow the issues between them as much as possible.

After a claim has been issued, you may wish to use the Service provided by HM Courts & Tribunals Service. It is free and will be conducted by telephone. You can also through the without speaking to one another. The appointment is limited to one hour, is confidential and can be done any time up to ten working days before the final hearing. If is unsuccessful then your claim will continue to a final hearing.

Even if you do not take advantage of the Service, you can settle at any time before the judgment is handed down.


Q80:How can I settle a small claim at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

You should immediately notify the court in writing if you are settling. If the claimant (who is responsible for paying the hearing fee) notifies the court of the settlement in writing at least seven days before the hearing, they will be entitled to a refund of the hearing fee. Note however that the court will not remove a hearing from the list until it is satisfied that both parties have agreed to the settlement. To demonstrate this, you could send separate letters to the court, or one signed by both parties to the dispute. The letter should also state what you have agreed regarding the payment of costs.

You can request the court to make a , known as a , setting out the terms of your settlement. The benefit of doing this is that the agreement can then be enforced by the court if one party it – see Q&A 86 for more information on enforcement of judgments.

To do this, you may send the court a draft expressed as being 'by consent', or a letter containing all the relevant information, in each case signed by both parties. Alternatively, each party may send to the court a signed letter containing the same terms of agreement.

A case may also be ended by the claimant discontinuing the claim.


Q81:How do I prepare for a small claim hearing at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

As seen in Q&A 74, you will receive a 'Notice of Allocation' telling you where and when your court hearing is. Ensure that you make a note of the date and time of your hearing.

The Notice of Allocation will also set out directions telling you what you should do before the hearing. You must comply with all of the directions or the court may adjourn (postpone) the case and order you to pay costs.

If you are the claimant, you must ensure that you pay the hearing fee by the date specified or your claim will be struck out (discontinued) – see Q&A 40.

However, you should still consider settling the case at this stage. Provided the court is told about the settlement seven days before the hearing, your hearing fee will be refunded – see Q&A 79 for more information on settling the claim.

Finally, you should collect all your notes, paperwork and evidence in an organised folder before the hearing so that you can turn to a particular page quickly in court. Ensure that you arrive in good time.

If you wish to claim any expenses, you should bring a note of how much you are claiming. If you wish to claim for loss of earnings, bring with you a letter from your . See Q&A 41 for more information on what costs may be claimed back.

The judge will ask most of the questions but come prepared to answer them and make a note in advance of what questions you wish to ask your opponent. It may be useful to bring pen and paper.


Q82:Do I have to attend the hearing for a small claim at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

You will be expected to attend the final hearing. However, the court has the power to postpone a hearing where a party, for good reason, cannot attend.

If you are unable to attend and do not wish to have the hearing postponed, you should notify the court and the other party by writing at least seven days before the final hearing. In your written notice, you should request that the court decide the claim in your absence and confirm that all documents sent to the court, on which you wish to rely, have been provided to the other party. Provided the right notice is given, when deciding on the claim the court will take into consideration any documents which you have given to the court and to your opponent.

If you are the claimant and you fail to attend the final hearing without giving the required written notice, the court may strike out (delete) your claim.

If you are the defendant and you fail to attend the final hearing without giving the required written notice, then provided the claimant either attends or has given the required written notice, the court may decide the claim based solely on the claimant’s evidence.

If neither party attends nor gives the required written notice, the court may strike out (delete) the proceedings altogether.

If you did not attend the hearing and did not notify the court in writing, you may apply for an order that any judgment the court had made be disregarded and that the claim be re-heard. However, you must apply within 14 days from the date on which you received the judgment. Note that the court will only grant such an application if you had a good reason for not attending and for failing to give written notice, and if you have a reasonable prospect of success at the re-hearing of the claim.


Q83:What happens at a small claim hearing at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court?

The hearing is informal, with the court having a wide discretion to conduct the proceedings in whatever manner it considers to be fair.

The judge may start by asking questions straight away, or they may give you and the other party an opportunity to briefly summarise your cases first. Ultimately, it depends on the particular judge who is hearing your case.

There is no official dress code for you, but you should dress smartly, present yourself well, and try and give a good impression to the judge. You should also address the judge as 'Judge'.


Q84:How are decisions on small claims at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court given?

The judge will normally give a decision orally, rather than a written judgment at a later date. Although they must give reasons, these need not be lengthy; they may be as brief and as simple as the subject matter of the case permits. The reasons will normally be given orally at the hearing, but the court may schedule a later hearing where the judge will give their decision and reasons, whether orally or in writing.

Where all parties have agreed to the case being decided based on the documents alone without a hearing, or if one or both parties are absent where the required written notice has been given (see Q&A 82), the court will give its reasons for the decision in writing and send a copy to each party.

At the final hearing, the court will also deal with the question of costs so be ready to discuss this. There are only very limited circumstances in which the court will order one party to contribute to the costs of another – see Q&A 41.


After a small claim hearing in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Q85:Can I appeal a decision of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court small claims track?

Yes. Although appeals are likely to be uncommon as the costs and effort involved often will be disproportionate to the subject matter of most claims, they may occasionally happen.

There is no automatic right of appeal – you must ask for permission to appeal. Note, however, permission will only be granted where the court considers that the appeal would have a real prospect of success or that there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard. You should ask the district judge who made the decision at the end of the hearing in which the decision was made. The court may suspend the proceedings to give you an opportunity to apply for permission at the Court of Appeal.

If the judge refuses permission to appeal, or if you did not ask for permission at the hearing but want to do so later, you should apply for permission to appeal directly to the Court of Appeal within 21 days of the date of the decision.

In cases where the claim was decided on paper without a hearing or where a party did not attend the hearing but gave the required written notice (see Q&A 82), permission should be sought directly from the Court of Appeal.

Applications to the Court of Appeal are made by filing and serving on the other party the Form N164. The appeal process is much less user-friendly than a , so far less suitable to tackle without the assistance of a lawyer. For access to a specialist lawyer in a few simple steps, you can use our Ask a Lawyer service.


Q86:If I am successful in my small claim at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, how can I enforce the judgment against the defendant?

After the court gives an order in your favour, the other party normally has 14 days from the date of the hearing to comply with it (eg make a payment to you). If they fail to do so, there are several ways of enforcing a judgment. The options available to you will depend on whether:

  1. you are seeking to enforce a money judgment (ie the defendant was ordered to pay you a certain amount of money) (see Q&A 87); or

  2. you are seeking to enforce a non-money judgment (eg the defendant was ordered to destroy certain offending ) (see Q&A 93).


Q87:How do I enforce a money judgment from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court against the defendant?

Your options for enforcing a money judgment are as follows:

  1. taking control of (see Q&A 88);

  2. obtaining a charging order (see Q&A 89);

  3. (see Q&A 90);

  4. (see Q&A 91); or

  5. applying for to be sequestered (see Q&A 92).


Q88:How do I take control of goods to enforce a money judgment from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court against the defendant?

If you are owed at least £600, you can apply to the for a 'writ of control' . This procedure allows an enforcement to seize the defendant's , sell them and then pay you the proceeds.

If you decide to issue such a writ, you will first need to request a 'certificate of judgment' by completing part 1 of Form N293A and sending it back to the court where the judgment was made.

Overall, this method of enforcement will be most useful where the debtor is not employed and does not have substantial assets or savings, but does have some valuable .

However, note that the process to obtain a writ of control in the can be complicated and expensive and in most cases would not be cost-effective. You should therefore consider one of the alternative options set out in Q&A 89 and following.


Q89:How do I obtain a charging order to enforce a money judgment from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court against the defendant?

A judgment debt may be enforced by securing a charge over the judgment debtor's land or securities.

This is an order where the court places a 'charge' on the debtor’s property – eg a house, a piece of land or stocks and . The charge will be the amount you are owed. The charging order will not normally get you your money immediately, but it may safeguard your money for the future, as if the property which is subject to the charge is sold, the charge usually has to be paid first before any of the proceeds of the sale can be given to the purchaser. You should note, however, that a charging order does not compel the debtor to sell the subject of the charge.

To apply for a charging order on land or property you must complete Form N379 and pay a fee of £135. You will need to submit an official copy of the entry(ies) for the title(s). If you are seeking a charging order against stocks and , or money in court, you must complete Form N380.

See Q&A 90 and following for alternative enforcement options.


Q90:How do I apply for a third party debt order to enforce a money judgment from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court against the defendant?

This order forces a to freeze the defendant's money if the holds or owes money to the defendant. The court will then decide whether that money should be paid to you. It is most commonly used against banks.

To apply for this order, fill in and send Form N349, and pay £135 to the .

This method of enforcement will be most useful where the debtor is not employed and does not have substantial or assets, but does have savings.

See Q&A 89, Q&A 91 and Q&A 92 for alternative enforcement options.


Q91:How can I make a statutory demand to enforce a money judgment from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court against the defendant?

If you are owed money by a or individual as a result of a money judgment, and the or individual does not pay you within the date specified on the (or within 14 days if no date is specified on the order), you can make a for the money. A is a formal, written demand for payment of a debt that you can send to your debtor without going to court and without paying any kind of court fee. However, note that if the debtor owes you less than £5,000 and is an individual, or owes you less than £750 and is a , the is likely to be ignored because you will not be able to bring or proceedings if the debtor fails to pay you.

To demand payment of a money judgment from a , use Form SD1. To demand payment of a money judgment from an individual, use Form SD4. Guidance on how to complete the forms can be found at Step-by-step guide to form SD1 and Step-by-step guide to form SD4. There are certain ways you must (deliver) the to the debtor in order for the demand to be valid – see Enforcing a judgment debt for further information.

After being with a , the debtor must pay you in full or otherwise secure the amount to your satisfaction within three weeks, or take necessary steps to challenge the demand. For further guidance on how statutory demands may be challenged, see Complaints and demands.

If the debtor does not pay or challenge the demand, and owes you more than a certain amount, you may apply to the debtor (in the case of an individual) or the debtor (in the case of a ). If you wish to do so, you should instruct a lawyer. For access to a specialist lawyer in a few simple steps, you can use our Ask a Lawyer service. You must be owed at least £5,000 to be able to apply to make a person , and at least £750 to be able to apply to a . Note that full coverage of proceedings is currently outside the scope of this service.

See Q&A 89, Q&A 90 and Q&A 92 for alternative enforcement options. You could also consider (where an impartial person acts as a referee between you and your debtor to try to resolve your dispute) which is usually cheaper than hiring a lawyer and taking court action. You can find providers on the Ministry of Justice website.


Q92:How do I apply for goods to be sequestered to enforce a money judgment from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court against the defendant?

If the defendant does not comply with the judgment, you can apply for a ‘writ of sequestration’ to enforce the judgment against the defendant’s property.

The effect of a writ of sequestration is to place, for a temporary period, the property in question into your hands, and you will manage the property and receive any rents and profits.

However, you must first apply for permission to the court where the claim was started by providing the court with (and delivering to the other party) Form N244.

The remedy of sequestration is a drastic remedy and will only be ordered in the most serious and clear cases.

See Q&A 89 and following for alternative enforcement options.


Q93:How do I enforce a non-money judgment from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court against the defendant?

Your options for enforcing a non-money judgment are as follows:

  1. recovering the (see Q&A 94); or

  2. applying for the to be sequestered (see Q&A 95).


Q94:How can I recover the goods to enforce a non-money judgment from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court against the defendant?

Where the court issued a judgment that the defendant should deliver to you without giving him the option to pay the ' assessed value, if the defendant fails to do so you can apply for a 'writ of delivery to recover the without alternative provision for recovery of the assessed value of those ' (also known as a writ of specific delivery) to recover the .

An application for this should be sent to the Court where your claim was started and also on the defendant. You can request the court to issue this writ using Form PF90A. However, first you should file an application notice using Form N244 and it on the defendant. This should state the order that you are seeking and briefly state why.

If the judgment gave the defendant the option to pay the ' assessed value, unless you have obtained the permission of the court for this option, you must apply for a separate 'writ of delivery to recover the or their assessed value'. You can request the court to issue this writ using Form PF90B.

Note that you will have to pay a fee of £80 for either writ.

See Q&A 95 for an alternative enforcement option.


Q95:How can I apply for the goods to be sequestered to enforce a non-money judgment from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court against the defendant?

If the defendant does not comply with the judgment, you can apply for a 'writ of sequestration' to enforce the judgment against the defendant's property.

The effect of a writ of sequestration is to place, for a temporary period, the property in question into your hands, and you will manage the property and receive the rents and profits.

However, you must first apply for permission to the court where the claim was started by filing with the court (and serving on the other party) Form N244.

The remedy of sequestration is a drastic remedy and will only be ordered in the most serious and clear cases.

See Q&A 94 for an alternative enforcement option.